- #Fraps or bandicam hd cracked
- #Fraps or bandicam hd 720p
- #Fraps or bandicam hd software
- #Fraps or bandicam hd trial
#Fraps or bandicam hd 720p
Pentium DualCore E6700 ( 3.2Ghz) 2 GB DDR2 RAM ATI HD3850 Games run at 1152x864 Which settings are recommended for Youtube HD 720p MPEG-1 or XviD. I know Bandicam can save me a lot of time by not needing.
#Fraps or bandicam hd trial
Bandicam provides hardware accelerated h. I tried out the trial version of Bandicam 1.7.0 a few days ago, hoping it lags less than Fraps, but in my case Fraps was the winner. Improved the recording performance by using a hardware-accelerated H.264 encoder.
#Fraps or bandicam hd software
Anyone using Windows 8 and have software that can record the desktop 12 comments. Also, I cant record my desktop (using windows 8) with Fraps. PCM and MPEG-1 Layer II audio codec support Im currently using Fraps and Audacity, but want more control over audio. H.264, Xvid, MPEG-1 and MJPEG video codec support Recording of WOW, Minecraft, Webcam, and computer screen VIDEO-RECORDING of games and streaming videos
#Fraps or bandicam hd cracked
But it's still good enough to be there in the top competition with Fraps.īut once again, you'll have to find a cracked version from a torrent if you want to avoid paying for the full version and licence. I'd say if you have to compare Fraps and Bandicam, they are somewhere around here but with Bandicam you won't achieve such a clean picture and full HD effects and resolution.
It can record in full resolution, it doesn't require much memory, it doesn't take much space and it doesn't stutter at all. The sharp edges and dark areas in this game with simple graphics are the obstacle course for the testing.Bandicam is good as a low budget program, definetly.
Look at the difference for the smaller size recordings! Bandicam clearly wins out in keeping quality with the small file size (Example: small file size recording "N", Bandicam's Default Recording Setting)Īgain, this comparison wasn't to show off shadows/effects of a high-end game, it was to compare the file sizes vs quality for each program and recording codec used. P - Bandicam MPEG-1 Quality80 'HalfSize' setting O - Bandicam MPEG-1 Quality80 'YouTube720p' setting N - Bandicam MPEG-1 Quality80 'Default' setting L - Playclaw MJPEGcompression (6 threads) J - Bandicam MJPEG Quality80 'Vegas/Premiere/Pinnacle' setting Here is the 4x4 (16-Video/Codec) comparison key (it is in order of largest file size produced to the smallest):ĭ - Playclaw NoCompression In general, the recorded segments in the video comparison are shown in order of largest disk space usage per second to the smallest. Recording Size: Varies, sizes are included in the video for each recording segmentĬodecs utilized: MPEG, MJPEG, UTyuv422, FRAPS1, various quality settings for all Recording Time: 10 seconds or 300 frames, attempt made to record from same location for each segment Resolution: Slightly higher than HD 1920x1096, (Maximized Window 1920x1200 Desktop with doubled taskbar), resized to fit into 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video rendered as final video output for upload
Recorded with: Fraps, Dxtory, Bandicam, Playclaw It is mainly a comparison of the file size produced (shown on the right hand side) vs the general quality of the recording (program/codec shown on the left hand side). Also, the sharp edges and movement of groups of pixels, along with solid colors and dark areas, are a good test of compression and will bring out any artifacts that the contending codecs might sweat out.
Without taxing the CPU/GPU extensively, more of the power can go towards recording and getting the most 'bang-for-the-buck' from the game recording apps. Yes, MC isn't exactly 'high-end-tessa-shadow-bump-mipped', but that's the point. I do a series of testing called TestRuns and wanted to compare side-by-side, video taken of the same material/game/area.įor this TestRun, the game used is Minecraft. I have recently finished a video comparing recordings from Bandicam (Registered), Dxtory (Trial Verison), Fraps (Registered) and Playclaw (Trial Version).
0 kommentar(er)
